Rapid RH and Carbide Bomb: The Pros & Cons of Each
Rapid RH and Carbide Bomb: The Pros & Cons of Each
Moisture testing is crucial in ensuring the longevity and durability of flooring installations. Two common methods are the Rapid RH test and the Carbide Bomb test. Here’s a detailed look at the pros and cons of each to help you choose the best method for your project.
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Accurate quantitative readings (total moisture content as percentage by wet weight) | Requires specialist calibration for scales and the gauge |
Fast for "one off" readings | Very slow for profiling with only consecutive test results - one after the other. |
Offers good credibility on site | Harmful/explosive gas emissions |
Subject to widespread misuse | |
The sample is destroyed in the process | |
Interpretation of test results requires training and experience | |
Destructive, especially for profiling | |
Requires separate samples for hygroscopic %mc to be determined | |
Many reading uses lots of reagent which is expensive, harmful and wasteful. |
Pros & Cons of the Rapid RH
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Low initial investment | Destructive Test |
Low cost per test | Determining consistent thickness of slab can be difficult |
Ease of use | |
Ability to quickly retest in concrete that has high RH% levels | |
"Profiling" a floor slab possible and easy | |
Wide spread acceptance in flooring industry | |
Useful measurement even in "non service" conditions | |
Ability to get very quick initial, meaningful readings |
Wagner Meters is a family-owned American business that aims to provide solutions in moisture measurement technology that will enhance the quality and value of each customer’s project. With an almost 60-year legacy of innovation, Wagner continues to be a resource for both individual craftsmen and high-performance commercial endeavors.
Last updated on May 15th, 2024